Epstein Secrets

's Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley had modified Mr. Epstein's judgment nunc pro tunc to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non-Prosecutio

ersation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or requiring that Mr. Epstein take an

the Mare to set a timely plea and sentencing date. At that time, you assured me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that a date would be set promptly. On November 15M, Rotondo Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another Matta, and was told by Mr. ICriab

. if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation lite suit pursuant to IN U.N.C. # 2255. Epstein will not cunttaa the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter. and Epstein will not context that the identified victims are person

way from employment and 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 19 public service activity, has that been articulated? MS. BELOHLAVEK: I believe Judge McSorley has a standard order somewhere on the bench up there regarding this, I'm told by the prosecutor. MS. LENHARDT: Judge, usually this is the probati

l would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court. See Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-CIV- 80893-MARILWOFINSON. To €acilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 5 EFTA0023

e failure to set a timely plea and sentencing date. At that time, you assured me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that a date would be set promptly. On November 15th, Rolando Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another matter, and was told by Mr. Kri

if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who,

ing your best efforts to insure that the plea and sentencing occur in November, we recardyleamed that a plea confluence had hem scheduled with Judge McSorley for November 20, 2007. but was canceled at the request of the parties, not the judge. Judge McSorley has not been away lbr any extended period, and

and the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding a settlement amount, then the victim can: a. ask the selected attorney to file suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255; or b. file suit in state or federal court pursuing damages under any state or

as agreed to plead guilty to state charges. Mr. Epstein’s change of plea and sentencing will occur on December 14, 2007, at ___ a.m., before Judge Sandra K. McSorley, 314 See 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c)(1)(B) and (c)(3). 315 Emphasis in original. Sloman also stated

ents and criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed.” On July 7, 2008, Edwards filed his emergency petition in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of Courtney Wild, who was then identified only as “Jane Doe.” She was soon joined by a second petit