Epstein Secrets

f Corrections . . . . As I learned on Friday when I received the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control ." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 26

nstead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in response to the lawsuit, filing a motion for authority to place $2,000,000 in an account maintained at the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court pending the results of the litigation. Mr. Epstein has always agreed that he is entirely responsible for any s

"learned from Mr. Epstein's attorney that the plea is scheduled to take place on Monday morning." I also understand that there is an entry on Judge McSorley's docket that a hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Monday. Both parties have agreed that it is a material term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement

nstead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in response to the lawsuit, filing a motion for authority to place $2,000,000 in an account maintained at the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court pending the results of the litigation. Mr. Epstein has always agreed that he is entirely responsible for any s

f Corrections . . . . As I learned on Friday when I received the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pro tunc to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 2

nstead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in response to the lawsuit, filing a motion for authority to place $2,000,000 in an account maintained at the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court pending the results of the litigation. Mr. Epstein has always agreed that he is entirely responsible for any s