Epstein Secrets

10 during the hours away from employment and 11 public service activity, has that been 12 articulated? 13 MS. BELOHLAVEK: I believe 14 Judge McSorley has a standard order 15 somewhere on the bench up there regarding 16 this, I'm told by the prosecutor. 17 MS. LENHARDT: Judge, usually this is

ctfully request that the Motion to Stay be denied. Dated: February 13, 2008 Respectfully submitted, By: 5/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey.M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) ihermanOltermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowi

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior

STEIN S. HOROWITZ. P. A. Respectfully submitted, C 4 By: - 6 - Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattonimcom Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitzesexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior

on all claims so triable. Dated: May Z-7, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL ssm(4sexabuseattorney.co Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160