Epstein Secrets

e failure to set' timely plea and sentencing date. At that time, you assured me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that' date would be set promptly. On November 15th, Rolando Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another matter, and was told by Mr. Krish

utes over liability in public adversarial litigations. Initially, we proposed that Mr. Epstein create' trust whereby' trustee would be appointed by the Circuit Court to disperse the funds to the identified individuals based on' good faith showing of injury. In response, Ms. proposed the appointment of I guardia

"learned from Mr. Epstein's attorney that the plea is scheduled to take place on Monday morning." I also understand that there is an entry on Judge McSorley's docket that a hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Monday. Both parties have agreed that it is a material term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement

We treat petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal and affirm. HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502006CF009454AXXMB & 502008CF009381AXXMB.

10 during the hours away from employment and 11 public service activity, has that been 12 articulated? 13 MS. BELOHLAVEK: I believe 14 Judge McSorley has a standard order 15 somewhere on the bench up there regarding 16 this, I'm told by the prosecutor. 17 MS. LENHARDT: Judge, usually this is

RIAM. We treat petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal and affirm. HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502006CF009454AXXMB & 502008CF009381AXXMB.

s Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley had modified Mr. Epstein's judgment motc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non- Prosecutio

es over liability in public adversarial litigations. Initially, we proposed that Mr. Epstein create a trust whereby a trustee would be appointed by the Circuit Court to disperse the funds to the identified individuals based on a good faith showing of injury. In response, Ms. Villafana proposed the appointment of

s Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley had modified Mr. Epstein's judgment motc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non- Prosecutio

es over liability in public adversarial litigations. Initially, we proposed that Mr. Epstein create a trust whereby a trustee would be appointed by the Circuit Court to disperses to the identified individuals based on a good faith showing of injury. In response, t proposed the appointment of a guardian ad lite