Epstein Secrets

de certified copies of same to the officer for use in compliance with the requirements of law. DONE AND ORDERED, on ?-r) NUNC PRO TUNC 96.30-2008 Sandra K. McSorley, Circuit dge I acknowledge receipt of a copy of this order and that the conditions have b planted to me and I agree to abide by them. Date: Inst

orth Dixie Highway Courtroom 11F West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: State of Florida" Jeffrey Epstein Case No.: 502006CF009454AXXXMB Dear Judge McSorley: We represent a witness in the above-referenced matter. It is kindly requested that a fifteen (15) minute or less special set hearing be scheduled

N, Defendant. CASE NO.: 2006CF009454AXX DIVISON: "W" AG REFT1 ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nuypber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is

plea 12 colloquy in Mr. Epstein's state proceeding 13 before Judge Puccillo, who is a retired 14 senior judge who was filling in for 15 Judge McSorley on that day, who was the 16 judge assigned to this division. It was a 17 plea agreement with the state attorney's 18 office and it is normal an

134AXX DIVISON: - W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 1 ro AG R Fn ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

the course of a plea colloquy in Mr. Epstein's state proceeding before Judge Puccillo, who is a retired senior judge who was filling in for Judge McSorley on that day, who was the judge assigned to this division. It was a plea agreement with the state attorney's office and it is normal and consistent

09454AXX DIVISON: "W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PNC, R EFVN ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE •FHIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h