Epstein Secrets

008 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list. ea* Michael R. Tein SERVICE LIST Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. 11101011n. Miami, Florida 33160 12 EFTA00215871

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

8 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list. 4444 Michael R. Tein SERVICE LIST Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstcin, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 12 EFTA00221976

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

8 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list. 4444 Michael R. Tein SERVICE LIST Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstcin, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 12 EFTA00222419

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

1- By: Jeffrey M. Herman jherman@,hermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mcrmelstein [email protected] Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 [email protected] www.hermanlaw.com - 5 - EFTA00222674 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM DocuncsiMik- CCNERealt:IFEITSD Doc

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

8 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list. 4444 Michael R. Tein SERVICE LIST Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstcin, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 12 EFTA01660036

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

e 101 v. Epstein Page 7 Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 3 160 Fax: ssmasexabuseattomev.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Re

No. 3-89-293-H. Jan. 16, 1990. Defendant who allegedly breached nonprosecu- lion agreement moved to dismiss indictment or to suppress statements. The District Court, Sanders, Chief Judge, held that: (I) defendant, who refused to cooperate by failing to meet with Government representatives, failing to testify b