Epstein Secrets

anted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.' 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RFP WPB 001775 (Exhi

57 than confer with the victims about the fact that resolution by NPA was ever being considered— or even tell them that it was already a signed deal—the Office and Epstein inserted a "confidentiality" provision into the agreement barring its disclosure to anyone, including the victims. There is no dispute that the Gov

anted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.' 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RFP WPB 001775 (Exhi

57 than confer with the victims about the fact that resolution by NPA was ever being considered— or even tell them that it was already a signed deal—the Office and Epstein inserted a "confidentiality" provision into the agreement barring its disclosure to anyone, including the victims. There is no dispute that the Gov

nted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.168 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RIP WPB 001775 (Exhi

57 than confer with the victims about the fact that resolution by NPA was ever being considered— or even tell them that it was already a signed deal—the Office and Epstein inserted a "confidentiality" provision into the agreement barring its disclosure to anyone, including the victims. There is no dispute that the Gov

nted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.'68 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 161 REP WPB 001775 (Exhi

57 than confer with the victims about the fact that resolution by NPA was ever being considered— or even tell them that it was already a signed deal—the Office and Epstein inserted a "confidentiality" provision into the agreement barring its disclosure to anyone, including the victims. There is no dispute that the Gov