Epstein Secrets

anted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.' 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RFP WPB 001775 (Exhi

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

anted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.' 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RFP WPB 001775 (Exhi

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

nted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.168 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 164 RIP WPB 001775 (Exhi

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts " 3 See Exhibit 88. IM Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18