Epstein Secrets

nted to know what was in it. The State Attorney's Office wrote the line prosecutor inquiring how to respond.'68 152. On September 16, 2008, attorney Jeffrey Herman, who represented several Epstein victims, wrote to the line prosecutor to strenuously object to the restitution procedures 161 REP WPB 001775 (Exhi

garding the status of the case and the planned indictmen and the draft written notification P-014647 thru P-014649 2/28/2008 emails between and Susan Roe regarding Work Product Investigative Privilege 6(e) related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review P-014650 thru P-0146

n Email regarding proposed response to Goldberger B 65 7/10/2008 Victim Notification letters to Individuals #3 (via Richard H. Willits), #8 (via Jeffrey Herman), ##17 (via Theodore J. Leopold), #25 (via Jeffrey Herman), #26 (via Jeffrey Herman), #37 (via Michael E. Dutko), and #44 (via Jeffrey Herman) B-6

tween Marie Villafatia, David Weinstein, and Bob Senior re email to the Civil Rights Chief B I ll, 2/28/2008 Entails between Marie Villafafia and Susan Roe regarding related investigation, potential investigatory leads, and CEOS review 2/28/2008 Email chain between Marie Villafain, Jason Richards, and

xhibit B-91). On September 15, 2008, I sent Notification Letters to Individuals 18 and 32 (Exhibit B-92). Soon thereafter, I received a letter from Jeffrey Herman, one of the civil attorneys who represented a number of victims, notifying me that he had complained to the Florida Bar that the Victim Notificatio

the Office, including my supervisor, Karen Atkinson, my co- counsel, John McMillan, Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards, AUSAs Lynn Kirkpatrick, Susan Roe, E.J. Yera, and DOJ Trial Attorneys Tammie Gregg and Myesha Braden. On several occasions, I drafted emails about re-assigning the case because the O