Epstein Secrets

n Email regarding proposed response to Goldberger B 65 7/10/2008 Victim Notification letters to Individuals #3 (via Richard H. Willits), #8 (via Jeffrey Herman), ##17 (via Theodore J. Leopold), #25 (via Jeffrey Herman), #26 (via Jeffrey Herman), #37 (via Michael E. Dutko), and #44 (via Jeffrey Herman) B-6

osure is "in connection with a judicial proceeding," that is, in connection with an administrative proceeding conducted by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) arising out of a decision by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2I United States, S.D. Fl

xhibit B-91). On September 15, 2008, I sent Notification Letters to Individuals 18 and 32 (Exhibit B-92). Soon thereafter, I received a letter from Jeffrey Herman, one of the civil attorneys who represented a number of victims, notifying me that he had complained to the Florida Bar that the Victim Notificatio

elson.com JONATHAN BRAN Direct Dial: 410.862.1073 E-Mail [email protected] May 10, 2019 VIA EMAIL °N4" Laura Ingersoll Counsel, Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. — Room 3266 Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: OPR Investigation Relating to Jeffrey Epstein Fed

victims” until after Epstein was sentenced and incarcerated. We have reason to believe that, around this same time, Mr. Sloman’s former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.> At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Offici

tions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confident