Epstein Secrets

tion for mandamus that would have to be heard within 72 hours." At least one prisoner has filed exactly this type of suit, not once, but twice. See Searcy v. NFN Palen, 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (prisoner who alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S. A

alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, and BOP to prosecute alleged perpetrator); Searcy v. NFN Skinner, 2006 WL 1677177 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006) (same). These fears are not imagined — several individuals have tried to use the CVRA to for

F.3d at 1081 (quoting Chaney, 470 U.S. at 831). That type of inquiry is exactly the one requested by Jane Does #1 and #2 — did the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida violate the CVRA. Here, Petitioners' request should be examined with even greater caution than the average agency decision because it in

remove Babbitt and Searcy from the list. There is too great a chance of an appearance of impropriety with Babbitt and I received a bad report about Searcy last night. Thank you. SSE Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax III From: (USAFLS)

? I am meeting with the agents and want to give them their marching orders regarding what they can tell the girls. Also, please remove Babbitt and Searcy from the list. There is too great a chance of an appearance of impropriety with Babbitt and I received a bad report about Searcy last night. Thank

ircuit, in and for Palm Beach County. As you know, the Agreement entered into by your client originally provided that the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (this Office) would defer prosecution if your client pled guilty to enumerated state charges by October 26, 2007. Since then, that date

ppeal dismissed due to waiver of right to appeal. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting 51 EFTA00224185 FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE- U.S. I Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; defendant's screen name was "Obesseddad11"; informed undercover agent that he was

le. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S. I Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; 37 yr-old male met 13 yr-old; 16 yr-old and one other und

onsummated Sting 49 EFTA01729533 : COultir -: . ‘• CASES-; - 1 . • • -. - :,FACILITY i:PACtSICOMNIT:ThlICAPON- 'CHAR0g t• U.S. v. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (1 l'h Cir. Internet Internet chat room; defendant's screen name was "Obesseddadl I"; informed 2422(b) Sting 2005) undercover

003) No Information No information available. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda • statements and evidence from bag denied. 2422(b) No Information N.D.N.Y. U.S. v. Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matt

tion for mandamus that would have to be heard within 72 hours." At least one prisoner has filed exactly this type of suit, not once, but twice. See Searcy v. NFN Paletz, 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (prisoner who alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S.

F.3d at 1081 (quoting Chaney, 470 U.S. at 831). That type of inquiry is exactly the one requested by Jane Does #1 and #2 — did the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida violate the CVRA. Here, Petitioners' request should be examined with even greater caution than the average agency decision because it in

due to waiver of right to appeal. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting 49 EFTA00079462 COURT CASES FACILITy FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v. Searcy. Internet Internet chat room; defendant's screen 2422(14 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. Sting name was "Obesseddadl I"; informed undercover agent th

3) No Information No information available. Motion to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. 2422(b) No Information r N.D.N.Y. U.S. v. Johnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matt

ICO One defendant sentenced to 40 yrs; other to 30 yrs. Affirmed. 53 EFTA00226343 COURT dale ' FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE"-•r. US I Searcy, Inter . et Internet chat room; defendant's screen 2422(b) 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. 2005) Sting name was "Obesseddad11"; informed undercover

available. to exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S., Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I. Johnson, . 2005 U.S. Dist LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; 37 yr-old male met 13 yr-old; 16 yr-old and one other

t 193 (1996) (expressing "the need for Congress to tie effective action to protect children and families from online harm"); see also United States Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005). Congress at that time recognized that the Internet allows anonymous predators to target children anywhere in

y believed (based upon the inaccurate police reports) to be a wide-spread commercial trafficking ring targeting minors, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida agreed to defer prosecution to the State. Notably, however, the Agreement also contained many unorthodox requirements, including requir