Epstein Secrets

and what 14 Mr. Critton means is that he will take Ego., for 15 example, as a witness in all of the state cases, 16 whether it's our cases, Mr. Garcia's cases, and 17 all the others; is that correct? 18 THE COURT: All the cases that he's aware 19 of. 20 MR. CRITTON: I'm going to ask -- 21 M

thin the bounds of reasonableness, 11 the Defendant is entitled to the information 12 contained in Interrogatory 19. 13 Now, with regard to the John Doe issue 14 relative to partners or Jane Doe, whoever may be 15 involved, I will permit, as did Judge Lewis in 16 her analysis, anyone who is name

their attorney said the military dragged its feet on the investigation, which only resulted in the arrest of the suspect this week." In a statement, Garcia said, "We are asking all women, especially Latina women or their families: Do not enlist in the army until we have assurance they will be protected

e was brought to Memphis from the Hardee Correctional Institution in Bowling Green, Florida, in order to face the charges." Love "was indicted as a John Doe in 2015 after DNA evidence connected him to the rape of a 21-year-old woman in Raleigh in the summer of 1986. In 2017, the FBI linked that DNA with

al, 2/8/96 and 2/9/96 Young v. Johnny's Hot Dog Stand (Los Angeles, California) Testified at deposition, 2/16/96 Testified at deposition, 8/23/96 Garcia v. Fowler (Albuquerque, New Mexico) Testified at deposition, 2/26/96 People of CA v. Sally McNeil (San Diego, California) Testified at trial, 3/13

f Campus Facilities, Washington, D.C., February 23, 1985. 37. Dietz PE: "The Charcot and Krafft-Ebing Schools of Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from John Doe, John Hinckley, and Other Defendants," National Organization of Forensic Social Work, Charlottesville, Virginia, March 28, 1985. 38. Dietz, PE: "A

vernment ■ 11/28/07 e-mail from A. Lourie to Investigative Privilege Communication; No Attorney-Client A. Marie Villafatia, A. Oosterbaan, IL Garcia re non-prosecution agreement, with attached correspondence; Relationship; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecuto

y's Conduct is at Issue — If the attorney's conduct is a central issue in the case, the work-production protection does not apply. See, e.g., In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1080 (4th Cir. 1981); Charlotte Moto• Speedway, Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 125 F.R.D. 127, 130 (M.D.N.C. 1989). E Rule 6(c) —