Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

s the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit making Judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herself as u victim. Quite to the contrary. She is not alone. We draw attention to this episode as but a recent indicati

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit Imo mg judgments consistent with our constitutional order to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herself as a victim. Quite to the contrary. She is not alone. We draw attention to this episode as but a recent indicati

witz, Acosta, Villafatia Sloman Email responding to Lefkowitz's statement in his letter that he needs to conduct "due dilligence" on selection of Podhurst firm 11/27/2007 Plea Notification Letter at 7:11 pm )3-3 11/28/2007 A. Marie Villafaiia, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia A. Lourie Email re non-pr

uyrkendall, Jason Richards, Dexter Lee, and Karen Atkinson rc preparation of victim notificatiot I letters and victim contact list and victims that Miler still needs to make contact with 13-70 7/21/2008 Victim Notification Letters to individuals NI, 2, 4, 9, IS, 14, 21, 23, 30, 32, and 38 B-71 8/5

akes no position as to the validity of any such claim units statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

s the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herself as a victim. Quite to the contrary. She is not alone. We draw attention to this episode as but a recent indicati