Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

t evidence. Thus. the Police Report and Pmbahle Cause Affidavit only affix a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Enteln's Office and G'arame. Ruth the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at IS) make RFP MIA 000449 EFTA00208930 12/

gainst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification law contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josershrog, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

evidence. 1 has, the Police RCM* and Probable Cause Affidavit only oiler a skewed view of tlx: facts material to this matter. Examples follow. I. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Epstein!r Office and Garage. Ruth the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at 18) make EFTA00214298 12/11/2007 11:39 FA

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

evidence. Thus, the Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit only affix a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. Examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Epstein's Office and Garage. Both the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at I make EFTA00176119 12/11/2007 11:39 FAX