Epstein Secrets

36-CV-MARRA P-013349 EFTA00230254 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 7 OF 7 The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge Davis conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingnes

udge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et at 10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his guilty plea and sentence. A

530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE e)001 Dear Jay, On September 24, 2007, your client, Jeffrey Epstein and two of his lawyers, Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. and Lily Ann Sanchez, Esq., in consultation with numerous other experienced and highly regarded lawyers, entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("the Agreement") with

gainst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification law contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josershrog, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

prefer a quick resolution with compensation for damages and will always support any disposition that eliminates the need fur trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to dated August 2. 2007.1 For the duration of the negotiations, we then continued to encourage the use of a restitution fund in place of civil lia

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

ms prefer a quick resolution with compensatinn for damages and will always supped any disposition UM eliminates the need For trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to Chief Matthew Menchel dated August 2. 2007.1 For the duration of the negotiations. we then continued to encourage the use of a restitution fund i

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by . You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the case to Mr

s prefer a quick mutation with etimpensation for damages and will always support any disposition lieu eliminates the need Mr trial. See letter from Lily Ann Sanchez to Chief Matthew Menehel dated August 2, 2007.1 For the duration or the negotiations, we then continued to encourage the Me of a restitution fund in