Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

irected than to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal 0 006 EFTA00207612 12/04/07 TUE 16:18 FAX 30S 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child RepIntuition and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

irected than to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal 0 006 EFTA00213819 12/04/07 TOE 16:18 FAX 30S S30 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICs Division's Child Rep!citation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

ng our meeting last Wednesday, November 21", you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defense team including Guy Lewis, Lili Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, and, apparently, Profe

ected them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal Ill Doe EFTA00289819 12/04/07 TUE 16:t8 FAX 30$ 230 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm ow interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. t am thus surprised to r

akes no position as to the validity of any such claim units statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

directed them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00234595 12/04/07 TUE 18:48 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

no position as to the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

directed them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00213073 12/04/07 TUE 18:48 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to