Epstein Secrets

ible claim that we breached the NPA by raising those concerns with you. EFTA00731108 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 16, 2009 Page 5 Once Mr. Podhurst was selected, Mr. Epstein and the defense team made every effort to retain Mr. Podhurst as soon as possible. Moreover, as you have acknowledged, the

ocuments, we presented you with your own email that acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

er to Judge Davis (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we ve no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated prisone

l law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUaalloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, Octo 25, 2007 Letter to Judge . Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the (work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

, ESQ. 2 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 West Flagler Street 3 Miami, FL 33130 For Jane Doe 101 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33130 7 For Jane Doe 101 8 FOR THE DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL BURMA

tact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: Colonel Michael Gauger Chief, Northern Division I EFTA00232797 EFTA00232798 U.S. Department ofJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA HAND