Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

n to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When you and I could not reach agreement, you repeatedly went over my head, involving Messrs. Lourie, Menthe', Sloman, and Acosta in the negotiations at various times. In any and all plea negotiations the defendant understands that his options are to plead

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by . You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the case to Mr

elieves that the creation or a trust would be in the victims hest interests. Villarana writes: It was not mail after nmeipt of this letter that Mr. Menthe' indicated to us that the scope of liability would encompass nut just the 12 individuals named 'tithe indictment, but "all of the minor girls identi

witz, Acosta, Villafatia Sloman Email responding to Lefkowitz's statement in his letter that he needs to conduct "due dilligence" on selection of Podhurst firm 11/27/2007 Plea Notification Letter at 7:11 pm )3-3 11/28/2007 A. Marie Villafaiia, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia A. Lourie Email re non-pr

ita to Matt Menthe! regarding Roy Black objection to subpoenas addressed to William Riley and Riley Kiraly 63 7/19/2007 Entails between A/Malaita, Menthe!, and Loire regarding service of target letters. 64 7/26/2007 Email from Villarafia to Man Menthe) and Andrew Londe regarding reconunended revisi