Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

actions is drippin with irony. We respectfully cull your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you -- as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit making Judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herse

gainst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification law contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josershrog, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

actions is drip in with irony. We respectfully cull your attention to the transcript or she interview with and guide you -- as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit a making judgments consistent with our constitutional order -- to the telling fact that did not in any manner view herself as

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

osecutorial actions si.th irony. We respectfully cull your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit Imo mg judgments consistent with our constitutional order to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view hersel

akes no position as to the validity of any such claim units statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

ial actions is dri in th irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herse

no position as to the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

torial actions is dri in irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with .nd guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. did not in any manner view herself as