Epstein Secrets

ible claim that we breached the NPA by raising those concerns with you. EFTA00731108 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 16, 2009 Page 5 Once Mr. Podhurst was selected, Mr. Epstein and the defense team made every effort to retain Mr. Podhurst as soon as possible. Moreover, as you have acknowledged, the

or his adversaries to pursue him in court. The Government may have endured some delays and administrative costs in verifying facts- such as that the Sheriff authorized work release according to state procedure and that the state issued certain orders--but neither the Government nor any civil plaintiff ha

er to Judge Davis (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

llegations of errors on Mr. Epstein's work release application to which you refer in your latest letter, each allegation was fully reviewed, and the Sheriff's office found its initial decision appropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind decl

back to the end of 2009 until May 11, 2010 - and even this invoice was without the charges of certain of the outside contractors relied upon by the Podhurst firm. We regret that these efforts did not resolve the matter and that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. elected instead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in

s and Regtilations of the Program. You Mull be confined In the counryiail until placement in said program, and If you are confined in the Jail, the Sheriff will tampon you to said. rogram. CI 4. You will abstain entkely from the use of alcohol and/or illegal drugs, and you will not associate with anyon

l law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUaalloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, Octo 25, 2007 Letter to Judge . Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

llegations of errors on Mr. Epstein's work release application to which you refer in your latest letter, each allegation was fully reviewed, and the Sheriff's office found its initial decision appropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind decl

back to the end of 2009 until May 11, 2010 - and even this invoice was without the charges of certain of the outside contractors relied upon by the Podhurst firm. We regret that these efforts did not resolve the matter and that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. elected instead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in

and Regulations of the Program. You shall be confined in the county jail until placement in said program, and if you are confuted in the jail, the Sheriff will %tampon you to said. rogram. K 4. You will abstain entirely from the use of alcohol and/or Illegal drugs, and you will not associate with anyo

law. A letter to Judge Davis (authored by then dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Davis. Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge Davis, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues in

llegations of errors on Mr. Epstein's work release application to which you refer in your latest letter, each allegation was fully reviewed, and the Sheriff's office found its initial decision appropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind decl

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

llegations of errors on Mr. Epstein's work release application to which you refer in your latest letter, each allegation was fully reviewed, and the Sheriff's office found its initial decision appropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind decl

ng on behalf of children who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elsa. Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami

and Regulations of • the Program. You EMS be confined in the oeunlyJeri until placement in said progrem, and if you art confined in the Jail, the Sheriff will transport you to said prognm. 0 4. You will abstain entirely from the use of aloohol and/or illegal dnigs, and you will not emulate with anyon

the total fees (over $1,000,000) is for legal work that the invoices document were done by two outside attorneys who are not even attorneys with the Podhurst Orseck, P.A. law firm. Mr. Epstein's disputes the necessity for and redundancy of these charges. We respect Your Honor's selection and regret tha

ce official confirmed Thursday that Epstein will be release( from the Palm Bead County Stockade on Jul- 22 — nearly 13 month into his sentence. Sheriff's office spoke person Eric Davis sa' Epstein has earned ga time for good behavi and for participating in work-release program. The began ye;

ach (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (c) Attorney's (Firm Nets*. Addrtu. one Tapirs/ Number) Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, F.sq. Podhurst °meek, P.A. My. stein M n NTS e FILED by rp__ D C. County of Residence of First Listed Dcfcriam Unite . tales Virgin (IN U.S. PLAINT F CASES

ounty Detention Center or Stockade Caving been sentenced in this Division)Persons admitted to either program shall be at the sole discretion of the Sheriff and his staff in determining their suitability. The undersigned takes no position with respect to the eligibility of any inmate sentenced in this D