Epstein Secrets

he federal statutes would be applicable to Mr. Epstein's conduct, a lay person cannot be expected to make that determination. As confirmed by Judge Stern's conclusions regarding the application of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the

olicy issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice, over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh

of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at imam is clearly not within the predictable scope of jt 2422. See Judge Stern's Letter ("In sum. whatever sexual contact occurred. occurred face to lace. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persuad

olicy issues raised by your Otrice's invocation of * 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we un sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sho

n of F 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the predictable scope of 2422. See Judge Stern's 1.etter ("In stun. whatever sexual contact occurred, occurred face to face. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persu

y issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is co m mon ground among us that Si 2255 has not been the subject or policy guidance front Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh