Epstein Secrets

take positions during the investigation and negotiation of this matter that has led to unprecedented federal overreaching. In fact. Judge I lerben Stern's states " . . Alta federal authorities inappropriately involved themselves in the investigation by the state authorities and employed highly irregu

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

e highly irregular and warrant a full review. We appreciate your willingness to consider the evidence. We respectfully request that you review Judge Stern's letter to Alan Dershowitz faxed to you on December 7. 2007. in connection with the concerns we set forth in this submission. 1. F1CDF.RAL INVES

gainst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification law contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josershrog, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

e highly irregular and warrant a full review. We appreciate your willingness to consider the evidence. We respectfully request that you review Judge Stern's letter to Alan Dershowitz. faxed to you on December 7. 2007. in connection with the concerns we set forth in this submission. I. FEDF.RAL INVES

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

| will be more than happy to do it, because it sounds !ike you all know more about it than |, but |'m happy to get affidavits from Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern, everybody else about what happened with this hearing today, because | know very [ittle about it. But my representations are what they are. MR. GOLD

handle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the c