Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of ac
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (100)
Entities connected to both Cynthia Nixon and Defendant's Motion to File
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON222 w/ Cynthia·6 w/ Defendant's
George W. Bush
PERSON170 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
United States
LOCATION141 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Julie K. Brown
PERSON107 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON95 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
LB
Leon Black
PERSON91 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON87 w/ Cynthia·6 w/ Defendant's
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON67 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION60 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Wilbur Ross
PERSON54 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON49 w/ Cynthia·6 w/ Defendant's
Kenneth Marra
PERSON48 w/ Cynthia·6 w/ Defendant's
Michael Douglas
PERSON47 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
the Southern District
LOCATION44 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
FBI
ORGANIZATION37 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Bill Richardson
PERSON36 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Alexander Acosta
PERSON34 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
Russell Simmons
PERSON25 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON24 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ Defendant's