Epstein Secrets

ion ofNat’lSec. Archive, 104 F. Supp. 3d 625 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (same); In re Petition of Kutler, 800 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 2011) (release of President Nixon’s grand jury deposition testimony in connection with third Watergate grand jury); In re Unseal Dockets Related to the Indep. Counsel’s 1998 Investiga

e. 2000 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 768'-8225 Facsimile: (561) 338-7099 By: Isl Stephen A. Mendelsohn STEPHEN A. MENDELSOHN Florida Bar No. 849324 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] By: Isl Michael J Grygiel MICHAEL J, GRYGIEL (Admitted Pro Hae Vice) 54

disclosure, the work product doctrine should not be "expansively construed" because it is in "derogation of the search for truth." United States I, Nixon, 418 U.S. EFTA00177850 683, 710 (1974). Law Offices is not the only case to cast doubt on Sporck. See generally P. Grady, Discovery of Computer

grievances against one another they are already embroiled in Judicial dissolution proceedings, and if complaints have not already been filed with the Florida Bar, they are likely to be." Rule 24(a) does not require interven- tion by Garfinkel and Katzman to protect themselves from Rosenbaum's complaints aga

. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a

n Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 o- ounse or e endant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully sub By: ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 rcritabcicl w.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeabcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive

ad committed any federal crimes, and entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, which was an exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. Nixon v. United States, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)("the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a c

aintiffs. Without attempting to make any connection to the asserted violation of the CVRA, Paragraphs 52 and 53 falsely allege that Movant violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing Epstein's employees in civil litigation after Movant retired from the United States Att

ad committed any federal crimes, and entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, which was an exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. Nixon' United States, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)("the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a cas

aintiffs. Without attempting to make any connection to the asserted violation of the CVRA, Paragraphs 52 and 53 falsely allege that Movant violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing Epstein's employees in civil litigation after Movant retired from the United States Att

re & Associates LLP Morgan Lewis Murphy & King Nixon Peabody Reese Marketos Scheper Kim Searcy Denn

ing Pharmacy Inc. Planned Parenthood Federation Quill Corp. Reed Elsevier Tampa Bay Buccaneers The American Law Institute The American Legion The Florida Bar Twitter Inc. UnitedLex Corp. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Wayfair LLC Zillow Inc. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Federal Bureau of Investigation Federal Deposit I

iation New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc. Planned Parenthood Federation Quill Corp. Reed Elsevier Tampa Bay Buccaneers The American Legion The Florida Bar Twitter Inc. UnitedLex Corp. Wayfair LLC YouTube Inc. Zillow Inc. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Commodity Futures Trading Commission EFTA00018655 --

ent Associate ASSOCIATE - CORPORATE (BOSTON, MA Nixon Peabody LLP OFFICE) Jericho, New York McCarter