Epstein Secrets

esses that have been interviewed. All of these images appeared to come from the camera positioned behind Epstein's desk. On December 13, 2005, Det. Dawson and I met with., do_b•••• During a sworn taped statement,.stated that when she was sixteen years old she was taken to Epstein's house to provide a m

of her and apologized for his actions and subsequent!} pan hiMNhGu3tari&M displays her photographs tliropghrout the houses DiiOcwber 12,30,0.5;,;Det.Dawson,and. ImietywiW a sworn taped-statement., that nothing happened between her and Epstein /disappeared nervous during t ae interview- TassureddieLthW ha

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY A. MARIE VILLAFANA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated JEFFREY’ Dated: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7of7 CA/Aronberg-000777 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:22:44 PM NOT A CERTI

LM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT rime: 15:01:37 Page: 23 Incident Report Program: CMS301L :ase No • 1-05-000368 attachment file. (Continued) Det. Dawson was assigned to relieve Officer Munyan at 4:00 pm; he informed me that at approximately 8;00 pm, Epstein had left for the airport and his private j

) Denied. (b) Denied. (c) Admitted. (d) Admitted. (e) Admitted to the extent that the reference to "Lillian Sanchez" was meant to refer to Lilly Ann Sanchez. (0 Admitted. (g) Admitted. 7. The government admits that, on about January 10, 2008, when Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 were sent letters advising

was in the shower at the moment and would be traveling back to Orlando to attend Colle e..4 I informed her I would be en route to her home in Det. Dawson and I drove to the...1ft home and met with 'and During a sworn taped statement, iller stated she was taken to the house by Haley Robson. She was

he approval of Mr. Tein) approves of the portion of my proposed Notification that quotes directly from the U.S. Attorney's December letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. The second portion is where Mr. Goldberger provides his interpretation of the Agreement, and nowhere mentions that he does not believe that the De