Epstein Secrets

rmation 9/18/2007 Garcia, Villafafia Laurie Email stating new terms that Laurie negotiated with Lefkowitz 9/19/2007 A. Lourie, R. Garcia, IC. Atkinson A. Marie Villafana Email re negotiating strategy with attached correspondence -4) 9/19/2007 A. Marie Villafafia A. Laurie Email re Epstein w

he had until June 30 to enter a guilty plea and Villafafia email to Leflcowitz re same B l') 6/23/2008 Villafafia, Kuyrkendall, Richards, cc: Atkinson Senior Email regarding New York Jane Doe and awaiting a response from DAG's office 6/23/2008 Emails between A. Marie Villafaiia, E. Nesbitt Kuyr

te 9/22/06) 9/21/2006 Subpoena to The Dalton School (return date 9/29/09) 9/26/2006 Acosta, Mulvihill, Sloman, Nom, Waters , Lowrie ' Stefin, Atkinson, Garcia, Brown, Boscovich, Martinez Villafana Memo regarding changes to Child Exploration Statutes in Tide 18 10/19/2006 Subpoena to Individua

and jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment B 13; 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emits between Marie Villafana and grand jury witness regarding immunity and tra

at he had until June 30 to enter a guilty plea and Villafafia email to Lefkowirz re same B-49 6/23/2008 Villafaiia, Kuyrkendall, Richards, cc: Atkinson Senior Email regarding New York Jane Doe and awaiting a response from DAG's office 6/23/2008 Emails between A. Marie Villafafia, E. Nesbitt Kuyr

tion Agreement incorporating Acosta edits provided to Gerald Lefeourt on 9/11/2007 68 6/18/2008- 6/19/2008 Entails between Villafafia, Krischer, Atkinson, Senior, Acosta, Sloman. and Garcia regarding Epstein's case with state court and how it might breach the NPA 69 12/14/2007 Draft letter to Kriseh

nd jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment IS Ill 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emails between Marie Villafaiia and grand jury witne, regarding immunity and tra

neys insisted that Criminal Chief Senior and that CEOS conduct similarly sterile reviews free from the "taint" of me and the federal agents. If Ms. Atkinson and I or the agents and I reached out to the SAO to discuss how the NPA should be worded to insure that we were getting correct information from Eps

shes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA Sloman's June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG Mandelker." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, a