Epstein Secrets

attorneys, Andy and I have discussed the case extensively. My original e-mail asking for everyone's input was addressed to Andy, you, and Jeff, and Karen Atkinson was cc'd. (Karen and I also have discussed the case in great detail.) The response to your e-mail was addressed only to you because i thought you w

erstate or foreign commerce" and instead treat that language as though it says only "the internet." They have simply ignored binding precedent from the Eleventh Circuit and the Supreme Court in making their arguments about the Commerce Clause and the interpretation of 2242(b). If there are any specific issues that

to you. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: oia itatie Vita/aria' A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00193927 MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ PA ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 29, 2009 Via U.S. Mail Hon. Jeffrey Colbath Palm Beach County Circuit

L/slm I Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit, Sag Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala., 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981). K&E 19439748.2 EFTA00193952 EFTA00193953

to my production of the Agreement to you and I will send a copy to you. Sincerely, kiffir-3/ Cleurtian Acting United States Attorney By: cc: Karen Atkinson, Esq. Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00233469 I I) Ft) I l:s1ICI. '•Al T1 LEOPOLD-KUVIN. CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS January 4, 2010 Assistant

009 WL 2567831, fn. I (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009). U.S.' Zane, 2009 WL 2567832, fn.l (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18 2009). As to the meaning of "actual damages," the Eleventh Circuit in McMillian i t F.D.I.C., 81 F.3d 1041, 1055 (I I th Cir.1996)3, succinctly explained: 3 In McMillian the I 1th Circuit was faced with the task of