Epstein Secrets

rds - and I'll let him speak and/or Mr. Keenan. To the extent that Mr. Edwards acquires any documents with regard to his two clients, at least for State Court purposes, all we would ask is the Court enter a p CbC,t ration order. And I think we can work out language that's appropriate. Not that we're e

day, is the inappropriate deposition. And I know we've got a bunch of people here. So as the Court probably has read in the media, the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, PA, law Page 5 1 police officers and sheriffs officers to go out 2 and to investigate and get, so to speak, the dirt. 3 We know tha

s Emergency Motion for Order of the Preservation of Evidence (D.E. #405). By this Motion, Epstein moves for an order requiring Herbert Stettin, the State Court appointed receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. ("RRA") law firm, to preserve all

s for an order requiring Herbert Stettin, the State Court appointed receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. ("RRA") law firm, to preserve all evidence relevant to the investment scheme referenced in the Motion and further prohibit the individu

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

t recall. Q Did you ever learn that privilege was being asserted with respect to the production of any emails that were contained on a Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler server? A Separate from a conversation with my attorneys, I don't recall. Q Are you aware, as you sit here today, that federal bankrupt