Epstein Secrets

ILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL I2 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011801 EFTA00192847 Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives h

or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported in Interstate or foreign commerce or mailed. 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (2002) (emphasis added). As with § 2423(b), however, Congress made significant changes to the statu

ection2d22(b); all in violation oflitIc IS, United Mahn Code, Section knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to travel in Interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sans./ conduct as defined in It U.S.C. § 2423(0. with minor female., in violation of Tide United St

Gloria Jean EFTA00192260 The two indictments were consolidated for trial.. What is hereinafter referred to as the first trial was commenced in the United States District Court in Min- neapolis, Minnesota, before the Honor- able Earl R. Larson and a Jury on March 20, 1967. On March 27, 1967, after considerable testimony h

ctice of prostitution. or to give herself up to debauchery. or any other immoral practice, whereby any such woman or girl shall be transported in Interstate or foreign commerce, or in the District of Columbia or any Territory or ion of the United States— "Shall be fined not more than $3,000 or impris

having persuaded. in- duced, enticed and caused Miss Hull to go from Minneapolis to New York for the aforesaid purposes' Joan flail for travel in Interstate coin. mew* from .Minneapolis-St. Paul Inter- national Airport. Weld Chamberlain Field, District of Minnesota. to New York City, State of New York.

, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-10183 D.C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-WS United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (January 31, 2008) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Before MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and HANCOCK ", District Judge. s. Honorable James Hughes Hancock, U

, § 2, cl. 2, as sources of that power.") (citations omitted). Indeed, the Supreme Court has commented on the "very different applications" of the Interstate and Indian Commerce Clause powers, explaining that interstate commerce jurisprudence "is premised on a structur- al understanding of the unique rol