Epstein Secrets

400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: I 6 EFTA00086382 GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-001713 EFTA00086383 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FCII 07-103 (WPB) IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS Party Filing Matter Under Seal ORDER RE: SEALED FILING Name: UNI

strict of Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That has been called to testify and to provide other information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, including a Grand Jury impanelled therein; and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney,

investigation, and Ms. likely testimony. Exhibit 1 at P-003732 thru P-003733. 7. On February 5, 2007, I provided Mr. Eisenberg with two proposed Kastigar letters that, again, discuss the grand jury's investigation. Exhibit 1 at P-003739 thru P-003743, P-003745. 8. In response to a complaint from Mr.

timony solely as a victim/winless. During our last conversation regarding Ms. , you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

rict of Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That has been called to testify and to provide other information before . the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, 'as refused to testify and provide other i

me, I can only say that my client does not want to do ei q of your suggestions. She does not want to give a statement under the irnmuni ed with its Kastigar exception and she does not want to test 5'h Amendment grounds. With this client, I am sorry, but I must have a formal grant of m it y f.re she wi

testimony solely as a vie 'm/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the Mftand intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her to con

. Govt. Works. Page 24 of 24 Page 24 https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?utid=%7bFEDF5709-3AEA-4F74-8619-... 4/10/2008 EFTA00191723 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No: D 18 U.S.C. § 371 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2) 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e)

alto Shapiro United States, 335 U.S. 1, 19, 68 S.Ct. 6, 1385, 92 L.Ed. 1787 (1948) (following rule of construction of Mike). More recently, in Kastigar, the Court up- held the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. 6002 on the ground that use immunity "is coextensive with the scope of the privi- lege again

certain charges pending in Alabama. Be cause it disputed the very existence of a grant of immunity, the government object- ed to the holding of a Kastigar hearing as unwarranted. Faced with this disputed claim of an un- written grant of immunity, the magistrate did not hold a traditional Kastigar hea

strict of Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That has been called to testify and to provide other information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, including a Grand Jury impanelled therein; and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney,n

ng their innocence. Our fear of any prosecution, especially • 11 f the Town police chiefs public remarks, is clearly in good faith. EFTA00185236 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT r...) 0 . . 1": rl SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NORTHERN (WEST PALM BEACH) DIVISION be t • : 7 0 ..-.1 :.•-,. - a :.2 CLI --; 7-*A2

imony solely as a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. =, you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

strict of Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That has been called to testify and to provide other information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, including a Grand Jury impanelled therein; and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney,

nding their innocence. Our fear of any prosecution, especially ' f the Town police chiefs public remarks, is clearly in good faith. EFTA00185339 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA n> 0 0 ....-.1 • :!. Iv, Z., on-: :1•• Ci NORTHERN (WEST PALM BEACH) DIVISION O ; ; - 0 7.0..0 -..: I FG

imony solely as, a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. , you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with.the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

ROY BLACK an attorney at law, duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am an attorney at law, duly admitted to practice before the State of Florida and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2. As detailed further below, I am counsel to Jeffrey Epstein, the movant herein. It is my intention herein

:4/17/2007 :4L FM Mal: 1/1 Y 1, am L. Richey, P Yiliiaa L. Richey, P.A. TO: 5 PAGE: 002 OF 00; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FGJ 07-103 (WPB) IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS FILED UNDER SEAL OLY-63 & OLY-64 REPLY OF WILLIAM

521-23. Interestingly, in that case, the government conceded that "the leaking of privileged materials to investigators would raise the specter of Kastigar-like evidentiary hearings". Id. at 517. This case presents the same specter should Mr. Epstein be indicted. The recognized importance of the attorn

f Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That TINMIIIIIhas been called to testify and to provide other information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, 1 MN has refused to testify and provide ot

ee Ex. A. I had several oral and written communications with Mr. Eisenberg asking him if Jane Doe 2 would appear under the protection of a standard Kastigar letter, but he told me that Jane Doe 2 would only appear if statutory immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 was received. For example, in my letter

ta: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b) and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a), l hereby approve your request for authority to apply to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002-6003 requiting to give testimony or provide other information in th

No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA EXHIBIT B-130 P-008365 EFTA00225363 has been approached by the FBI to provide information via an informal proffer with a "Kastigar letter" or testifying before t djury with a "pocket immunity" letter. is represented by counsel in New York. has never spoken to any law enforceme