Epstein Secrets

9941 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 22-2 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 21 Exhibit B EFTA00039942 Case17260-00832-RME DanunOtate Saud-how itivrios UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT S4 16 Cr. 832 (KMK) NICHOLAS TARTAGLIONE, Defendant. x CO

eafter did perform a crime of violence to further the unlawful activity, and did • aid and abet the same, and death resulted, to wit, after Urbano Santiago accompanied Martin Luna to the Likquid Lounge, where Luna had been lured by TARTAGLIONE and others, Urbano Santiago was held captive, transported t

IONE, the defendant, intentionally and knowingly killpd, and counseled, commanded, induced, procured, and caused the intentional killing of Urbano.Santiago, in and around the vicinity of 419 Old Mountain Road in Otisville, New York, and did aid and abet the same. (Title 21, United States Code, Section

5415 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 22-2 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 21 Exhibit B EFTA00075416 Case17260-00832-RME DanunOtate Saud-how itivrios UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT S4 16 Cr. 832 (KMK) NICHOLAS TARTAGLIONE, Defendant. x CO

eafter did perform a crime of violence to further the unlawful activity, and did • aid and abet the same, and death resulted, to wit, after Urbano Santiago accompanied Martin Luna to the Likquid Lounge, where Luna had been lured by TARTAGLIONE and others, Urbano Santiago was held captive, transported t

IONE, the defendant, intentionally and knowingly killpd, and counseled, commanded, induced, procured, and caused the intentional killing of Urbano.Santiago, in and around the vicinity of 419 Old Mountain Road in Otisville, New York, and did aid and abet the same. (Title 21, United States Code, Section

ef; William W. Mercer, U.S. Attorney, District of Montana, and Eric B. Wolf, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, were on the brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00024-CCL. Before: B. FLETCHER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANN

as "devoid of any badgering or harass- ment." Id. Looking to the totality of the circum- stances considered by the district court, we con- cluded, in Santiago, that the district court's volun- tariness finding was not clearly erroneous. Id. Sim- ilarly, we must conclude that Mr. Johnson's concern that he m

. However, Mr. Johnson himself stated that at no time did he feel threatened or coerced. With res t to the second submission, in United States I Santiago. 428 F.3d 699, 705 (7th Cir.2005), we determined that a defendant had con- sented freely and voluntarily to a search despite his claim that officer

ion of Law and Morals, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 (1958) 130 Sexual Abuse Prosecutions, 77 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1 (1986) 24 xxvi EFTA00103025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The G

287 (2d Cir. 2018) 177, 178, 188 United States v. Samsonov, No. 07 Cr. 1198 (CM), 2009 WL 176721 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2009) 269 United States v. Santiago, 987 F. Supp. 2d 465 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 75 United States v. Sarwari, 669 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2012) 179, 180 United States v. Sattar, 272 F. Supp.

NDDS, for the 1999 edition of Federal Narcotics Prosecutions. http://10.173.2.12/usao/cousa/ole/usabook/drug/26drug.htm 4/10/2008 EFTA00191635 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Notice of Appeal From Magistrate's Order Denyi

of implication Unit States' Dudley, 62 F.3d 1275, 1278 (10th Cir. 1995); Oiled States Patriarca, 948 F.2d 789, 793 (1st Cir. 1991); United States Santiago, 826 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1987). "[There is no conflict between Rule 46(f) and the Bail Reform Act; the Rule and the Act are complementary and form a

mmarize any CDM or portions thereof, absent leave of the Court to file the document or portion thereof under seal in accordance with Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. See Exhibit 1, Proposed Protective Confidentiality Order. EFTA00191290 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247

ct the Intervenors from "annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense." See Looney, 2014 U.S. Dist. LENS 48349, at *5; Irizarry- Santiago'. Essilor Industries, 293 F.R.D. 100, 104 (D. P.R. 2013). The Intervenors include not only the third-party client whose non-prosecution agreement is