Epstein Secrets

. LEXIS 22359 at '4-5 (M.D.Fla. July 20, 1995). In Florida, corporate claims of privilege are sub- ject to a heightened level of scrutiny, and the Florida Supreme Court has established five criteria to establish a corporate claim of attor- pep-client privilege. Deacon, id., at 1383. 10. While the Second Circuit has

ntervention as of right."); United Stalest. AT & T Co., 642 F.2d 1285, 1292 (D.C.Cir.1980); Sackman I. Liggett Group, Inc., 167 F.R.D. 6, 20-21 (E.D.N.Y. 1996). In allowing intervention, this Court notes that Garfinkel and Katzman have not demonstrated that Rosenbaum in fact served as their lawyer

hought processes of Plaintiffs attorneys will be revealed. See also In re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 119 F.R.D. 4, 5-6 (E.D.N.Y. & S.D.N.Y. 1988) (book of photographs, compiled by plaintiff's attorney, showing various forms of asbestos to which plaintiff had been exposed, was d

ards, including the David Dyer Professionalism Award and the Tobias Simon Pro Bono Award, which is "presented annually by the Chief Justice [of the Florida Supreme Court) to the attorney who best exemplifies the highest ideals of the profession in assuring the availability of legal services to the poor." IS. Mr. Jo

dant, and for which Defendant expressly agreed to pay pursuant to a Non-Prosecution Agreement that he entered into with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff further alleges: ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING TO ALL COUNTS Jurisdiction I. Plaintiff, Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ("Podhurst firm" or

ards, including the David Dyer Professionalism Award and the Tobias Simon Pro Bono Award, which is "presented annually by the Chief Justice [of the Florida Supreme Court) to the attorney who best exemplifies the highest ideals of the profession in assuring the availability of legal services to the poor." IS. Mr. Jo

dant, and for which Defendant expressly agreed to pay pursuant to a Non-Prosecution Agreement that he entered into with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff further alleges: ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING TO ALL COUNTS Jurisdiction I. Plaintiff, Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ("Podhurst firm" or