Epstein Secrets

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

ellee Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., d/b/a The Palm Beach Post. William J. Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee E.W. Diana L. Martin and Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee B.B. EFTA00183082 Not final until disposition of timely filed motio

d former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who now represents some of the women. "Everybody was in on this deal except the victims and the public," Berger said. "The public should be outraged it has gone as far as it has." A second attorney representing the women, Brad Edwards, has seen the seal

he reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for ■.; Diana L. Martin for M.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00184013 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

ellee Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., d/b/a The Palm Beach Post. William J. Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee E.W. Diana L. Martin and Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee B.B. EFTA00233336 Not final until disposition of timely filed motio