Epstein Secrets

y you think that the aggregate cases not having anything to do with Mr. Edwards' representation or Rothstein firm's representation -- because Mr. Berger, I think, was involved in some respects as well. MR. SCAROLA: Co-counsel. THE COURT: Solely as co-counsel -- I believe that to be the case -- are

se Fifth Amendment questions that were asked of my client -- THE COURT: No probative value. MS. ROCKENBACH: No probative value. And the Frazier -- the Fourth DCA says that even that adverse inference against parties when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them. If my c

;Aire., Ste; 1400, West IN; ... ': ' Palm Beach, FL 33401..(4a: . ); and Bradley .11.. Ed4cliiliq. and, WIWate J. . .11 • L'; Blvd. 4 i $ .. Berger, Esq., Rothstn ieRosenfeldt Adler 40 East Las Olen 131 ..it'ulie .650, ) PortPortLauderdale, : • • .. i i 040., • r. .. • 1 1 O .. l:

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

• ; ; .., : ' 1 • •• $.1 • i ht '. •• Palm Beach, FL 33401 (fax: =~; and Bradley4 • . and William J. , . • . • y llf 'I' i • . . : Berger; Esq., RothstakfRoeenlbldiAdler, 401 East Las Olas Blvd :111.; 3650, Fon Lauderdale, I li • ' I ' , jr, !. Ir: ' .:ridri Pt 43JN (taxi ba

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has