Epstein Secrets

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00206624 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00213917 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

rts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. n 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 73 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 75 25 Singerman on behalf of the trustee dist they had OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, EFTA00235301 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-3

Document 685, have a 20 protective ceder that was entered with Mr. Scherer's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the cue with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is t