nts are held by the trustee now, and so Mr. Stettin was concerned that there may be some privilege issues on those documents, and as a result, Mr. Lichtman and the attorneys came forward before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I beca

ause if the trustee believed that -- THE COURT: There's no litigation pending. MR. FARMER: That we -- Edwards and LM have not been sued -- I mean, Lichtman's been sued, Adler. People have been brought in by the trustee because they've found evidence that they believe constitutes some wrongful conduct,

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

, your Honor, may it 4 those, et cetera, our client has already offered 4 please the Court Again, Gary Fanner on behalfof 5 to the trustee, to Mr. Lichtman, we will pay for 5 the interested party, LM, also on behalf of 6 it, whether ifs a special master or whether it's 6 Brad Edwards and I'm sorry, y

n on this matter, having spoken with him 20 numerous times about numerous other matters, to 21 speak either with him or with his counsel 22 Mr. Lichtman. I did have the opportunity to speak 23 with Mr. Coffey on Friday. 24 !can, if it would assist the Coun, proffer 25 to the Court and, if necess

position. Attorneys handling the bankruptcy are trying to find any ill-gotten gains in an effort to pay back investors who lost money to the scam. Lichtman cited another e-mail, without giving the date, in which Rothstein directed staff to cut a check to Rosenfeldt for $62,000, and then directed Rosenfe

ors and investors. "I believe Scott would tell the truth," he said. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray, who presid- ed over Monday's hearing, told Lichtman he will approve Roth- stein's deposition so the bank- ruptcy attorneys can glean infor- mation that will be used to file ad- ditional clawback lawsui

2009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

and over. So, he switched back to reading the complete sentence again. As usual, bankruptcy attomey Chuck Lichtman delivered some zinger questions. Lichtman, of Berger Singerman, asked Rosenfeldt whether he had accepted a check for $3.9 million, and other money, because Rothstein wanted him to look the

y organized this proceeding and who may be able to answer any other questions which you may have in this regard. Sincerely, Larry LaVecchio, AUSA Lichtman responded to Ackerman as follows: As I have explained, there will be a large number of parties already authorized to ask questions on discrete issu

f communications on the next page purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as