Epstein Secrets

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00206624 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

of a different 10 perspective of some things and there arc some points 11 that ought to be corrected. 12 Mr. Stettin received a subpoena in a 13 Palm Beach State Court action for production of 14 documents, and as we had done in virtually every 15 subpoena, we went to ow forensic accountants, 16 the Berkowitz Dic

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00213917 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

of a different 10 perspective of some things and there arc some points 11 that ought to be corrected. 12 Mr. Stettin received a subpoena in a 13 Palm Beach State Court action for production of 14 documents, and as we had done in virtually every 15 subpoena, we went to ow forensic accountants, 16 the Berkowitz Dic

rts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. n 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 73 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 75 25 Singerman on behalf of the trustee dist they had OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, EFTA00235301 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-3

st have kind of a different perspective of some things and there arc some points that ought to be corrected. Mr. Stettin received a subpoena in a Palm Beach State Court action for production of documents, and as we had done In virtually every subpoena, we went to ow forensic accountants, the Berkowitz Dick Pollack