Epstein Secrets

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

e dates when you are available this month, we can schedule a short meeting in your office hopefully before the year ends. RB/wg Enclosure Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00193779 Epstein 1 RRA, et al. Page 2 and others. Rothstein and RRA's fraud had no boundary; Rothstein and his co- c

pstein woud appear in a sawn laWal Fame. Chat Judge 811 WOW. wed manedu one of Me victima. end The Pain Bead) Poet sagN the unsealing of the evened Berger refers ail as a 'swell/wan 0aai • 'Why wee li so Imported 'or he godmmont to make ads deal?' Berger asked ttelalcaay 'We have not yet had honest ex

st Turn Over Docs In Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Case John Pacenti, Daily Business Review April 22, 2014 Roy Black Partner Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf Attorneys for two alleged sexual assault victims trying to negate a federal nonprosecution agreement with billionaire pedophile

S was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bi

e been stymied from debunking fraudulent claims brought by the Rothstein criminal enterprise because you have threatened that such action on Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00223266 A. Villafafia, Esq. December 9, 2009 Page 3 our part would constitute a breach of the NPA. So the Rothste