Epstein Secrets

n a small towel. Former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who represents one of the victims, and The Palm Beach Post sought the unsealing of the agreement. Berger refers to it as a "sweetheart deal.” "Why was itso important for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had

ice and approved by Epstein - to represent some of the victims in civil suits they had filed against Epstein. That attorney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. Former prosecutor Johnson said he has never seen a provision like that before. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck

dge Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." “Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. “We have not yet had ari honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down t

attorney -- tapped by the U.S, Attorneys Office and approved by Epstein -- to represent some of the victims. That attorney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement Signed the following month struck Epstein’s duty to payJosefsberg if he and the victims did not accept settlements.

Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?'' Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down

orney -- tapped by the U.S. Attorney's Office and approved by Epstein -- to represent some of the victims. That attorney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epstein's duty to pay Josefsberg if he and the victims did not accept settleme

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

ey — tapped by the US. Attorney's Of- fice and approved by Ep- stein — to represent some of the victims. That attor- ney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epsteinb duty to pay Josefsberg if he and the victims did not accept settl

d former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who now represents some of the women. "Everybody was in on this deal except the victims and the public," Berger said. "The public should be outraged it has gone as far as it has." A second attorney representing the women, Brad Edwards, has seen the seal

ey — tapped by the US. Attorney's Of- fice and approved by Ep- stein — to represent some of the victims. That attor- ney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epstein's duty to pay Josefsberg if he and the victims did not accept set

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

the power of the federal government to perpetrate and further their fraud. And the expense of litigating these cases has been extreme. For example, Bob Josefsberg, who I do not believe was aware of the Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the invest

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

— tapped by the US. Attorney's Of- fice and approved by Ep- stein — to represent some of the victims. That attor-. ney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epstein% duty to pay Josefsberg if he and the victims did not accept settl

S was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bi

the power of the federal government to perpetrate and further their fraud. And the expense of litigating these cases has been extreme. For example, Bob Josefsberg, who I do not believe was aware of the Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the invest

dge Bill Berger, also representing victims,, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal,” "Why was it so important for the government to makethis deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down th

attorney — tapped by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and approved by Epstein -- to represent some of the victims. That attorney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg. But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epstein’s duty to payJosefsberg if he and the victims'did not accept settlements