Epstein Secrets

erger . and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. (; :si Shullman, Esc was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present on behalf of_ Assistant State Attorney Barbara Bums was present

ified copies of same to the officer for use in compliance with the requirements of law. DONE AND ORDERED, on 4f/ an; i( NUNC PRO TUNC 06-30-2008 Sandra K. McSorley, Circuit A- I acknowledge receipt of a copy of this order and that the conditions have be lained to me and I agree to abide by them Date: Supervis

been assigned to. On that date, retired Judge Deborah Pucillo was substituting for the assigned Division `W.' judge, Sandra McSorley, because Judge McSorley would not be sitting on that day. 4. Judge Pucilb handled all cases assigned to Division Mt on June 30, 2008 including that of the Defendant. SDNY

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

"learned from Mr. Epstein's attorney that the plea is scheduled to take place on Monday morning." I also understand that there is an entry on Judge McSorley's docket that a hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Monday. Both parties have agreed that it is a material term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement

half of The Post is? MS. SHULLNAN: Deanna Shullnan THE COURT: S-H-U-L -- KS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-X-A-N THE COURT: Me. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Berger, good morning. And Mr. Borger, your client is E -- NR. BERGER: ., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? Nit. EDWARDS: Bred Edwards on behalf of as

f Corrections . . . . As I learned on Friday when I received the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pro tune to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 2

ldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present on behalf of B.B., Assistant State Attorney Barbara Burns w

plea 12 colloquy in Mr. Epstein's state proceeding 13 before Judge Puccillo, who is a retired 14 senior judge who was filling in for 15 Judge McSorley on that day, who was the 16 judge assigned to this division. It was a 17 plea agreement with the state attorney's 18 office and it is normal an

;Aire., Ste; 1400, West IN; ... ': ' Palm Beach, FL 33401..(4a: . ); and Bradley .11.. Ed4cliiliq. and, WIWate J. . .11 • L'; Blvd. 4 i $ .. Berger, Esq., Rothstn ieRosenfeldt Adler 40 East Las Olen 131 ..it'ulie .650, ) PortPortLauderdale, : • • .. i i 040., • r. .. • 1 1 O .. l:

plea 12 colloquy in Mr. Epstein's state proceeding 13 before Judge Puccillo, who is a retired 14 senior judge who was filling in for 15 Judge McSorley on that day, who was the 16 judge assigned to this division. It was a 17 plea agreement with the state attorney's 18 office and it is normal an

• ; ; .., : ' 1 • •• $.1 • i ht '. •• Palm Beach, FL 33401 (fax: =~; and Bradley4 • . and William J. , . • . • y llf 'I' i • . . : Berger; Esq., RothstakfRoeenlbldiAdler, 401 East Las Olas Blvd :111.; 3650, Fon Lauderdale, I li • ' I ' , jr, !. Ir: ' .:ridri Pt 43JN (taxi ba

the course of a plea colloquy in Mr. Epstein's state proceeding before Judge Puccillo, who is a retired senior judge who was filling in for Judge McSorley on that day, who was the judge assigned to this division. It was a plea agreement with the state attorney's office and it is normal and consistent

Berger, also represent- ing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so impor- tant for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hon- est explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold

10 during the hours away from employment and 11 public service activity, has that been 12 articulated? 13 MS. BELOHLAVEK: I believe 14 Judge McSorley has a standard order 15 somewhere on the bench up there regarding 16 this, I'm told by the prosecutor. 17 MS. LENHARDT: Judge, usually this is