Epstein Secrets

Epstein (Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) prior to completing my investigation. My co-counsel (John McMillan) agreed with me. Our supervisor, Andrew Lourie, overruled us. b. AUSA McMillan and I did not want to have a subsequent meeting with another set of attorneys for Epstein, including Lilly Ann Sanc

of a federal case, but I don't recall discussing that at the time. 35 I had never before used a non-prosecution 34 As I noted in my filings in the Jane Doe' United States litigation, I had concerns about informing the victims that part of the negotiations involved securing for them the right to obtain d

w Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Andrew Lourie, Deputy Chief, Northern Region A. Marie Villafaila, Assistant United States Attorney The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Flor

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

w Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h Street Miami, Florida 33132 Andrew Lourie, Deputy Chief, Northern Region A. Marie Villafafia, Assistant United States Attorney The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Flor

t there, in facts far different from ose presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in Prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

w Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h Street Miami, Florida 33132 Andrew Lourie, Deputy Chief, Northern Region A. Marie Villafafia, Assistant United States Attorney The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Flor

court in Doe'. Epstein, No. 9:08- cv-80I19-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the scheduled deposition date. Jane Doe's counsel agreed, and then Brunel's attorney cancelled the rescheduled deposition date. Brunel's counsel represented that Brunel was outside the count

but not limited to: R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney), Jeffrey Sloman (First Assistant U.S. Attorney), Matthew Menchel (Chief, Criminal Division), Andrew Lourie (Deputy Chief, Northern Region), and AUSA Anna Marie Villafana. Mr. Epstein retained counsel with expertise in federal law and federal jurisdiction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenor. I INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO

ange for money, ranging from $200 to $1,000 per session. Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product EXHIBIT B-123 EFTA00225178 Division Andrew Lourie, Chief of the Criminal Division Matthew Menchel', First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman', United States Attorney R. Alexander Aco

female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- .; ;. year-old girl. (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or

response from the Civil Rights Division to the notification. Criminal Division *until late Feb. 2008 Alice Fisher Assistant Attorney General Andrew Lourie * Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Sigal Mandelker Deputy Assistant Attorney General Andrew Oosterbaan Chief, CEOS Office of the

victim denied being involved in, or being a victim of, criminal activity. Later, the victim obtained new counsel and joined the CVRA litigation as “Jane Doe #2.” 219 In his March 20, 2011 letter, addressed “To whom it may concern,” and published online in The Daily Beast, Acosta described “a year-lo

in the former firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled “Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein,” despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

an, p.2, q2. The Truth: e It was the government, and not the defense, that suggested a plea to state charges to resolve the federal investigation. Andrew Lourie proposed declining prosecution in favor of the state. Although Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney’s Office had already reached a plea agreement, in A

18 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted P-013985 thru P-013989 6/14/2007-6/21/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia, Karen Atkinson, Andrew Lourie, Matt Menchel, and Jeff Sloman regarding addendum to Pros Memo, grand jury presentation and changes to indictment, and meeting with counsel for Eps

Work Product Deliberative Process P-014440 12/11/2007 email from Marie Villafaila to Jeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with lawyer for Jane Doe #2 (T.M.) Work Product Deliberative Process P-014441 12/12/2007 emails between Marie Villafafta, Frederica Devlin, and Bob Senior regarding plan