Epstein Secrets

otes, draft victim notification letter, and draft correspondence to Jay Leflcowitz (Also contains a November 28, 2007 letter from Kenneth Starr to Alice S. Fisher; and a November 29, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz to R. Alexander Acosta (P-010528 thru P-010530 and P-010556 thru P-010559). Pursuant to the Co

" containing attorney research Work product Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680 File folder entitled "Serene Cano (N.Y. AUSA)" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes Work product Box #1 P-003681 Thru P-003687 File folder entitled "Dr. Anna Salter" containing attorney (Villafafia) memo to

LY-01 through OLY-81, correspondence and research related to enforcement of same, documents produced in response to some subpoenas; and attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Contains documents subject to investigative privilege Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of

s, draft victim notification letter, and draft correspondence to Jay Lefkowitz (Also contains a November 28, 2007 letter from Kenneth Starr to Alice S. Fisher, and a November 29, 2007 letter Erom Jay Lefkowitz to IL Alexander Acosta (P- 010528 thru P-010530 and P-010556 thru P-010559). Pursuant to the Co

Public Prosecutor, Attorney Conduct at Issue Box #1 P-004561 Thru P-004565 Filed folder entitled "JANUSZ BANASIAK" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes of interview Work product Investigative privilege • Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipa

US Attorney's Office 305-530-6444 305-961-9100 CC: Company: Fax #: Direct Jeffrey II. Slornan US Attorney's Office 305-530-6444 30596192/9 Alice S. Fisher Department of .1 usriee 202-5114-9412 202-514-2601 From: .1:3y P.T.elkowitz Date: Parpswitowy: Fox #: December 2 I • 2007 S IM -446-6460

osta met with Kirkland & Ellis partners Jay Lefkowitz and former Solicitor General Ken Starr and Ms. Sanchez, along with Chief Oosterbahn and AUSAs Villafafla, John McMillan, and FAUSA S lomat' Messrs. Starr and Lefkowitz presented arguments regarding the sufficiency of the federal interest in the case and