5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
6 / 5
Mentions
isa re: povider records; finalize letter to Mamie!stein; finalize Motion to separate Does 2 through 7 as not consolidated: fax letter and motion to Mermelstein: go through task list with MJP; conference with JMB; pull and copy several documents for JMB; pull letters from RDC stacks to copy for EW case; pre
with legal assistant regarding filing of Federal Court Motions to 0.25 hr $75.00 Compel and Exhibits 04/02/2009 RHB Review correspondence from Mermelstein (JD Nos. 2-7) regarding tax returns 0.10 hr $30.00 04/02/2009 RHB Review Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Quash based on 5th Amendment (E.W.) 0
e answers in EW and LM 04/0612009 RDC Review dosing papers with Patrick and revise subpoena and letter to Bob J 04/062009 RDC Receipt and review Josephsberg April 3rd letter with signed Tolling Agreement;BB- Kuvin's April 3rd letter and Notice of Hearing; AC.CMA - Hills' April 2 letter with Stipulation
t Epstein, other civil attorneys were filing similar lawsuits against Epstein. For example, on or about April 14, 2008 another law firm, Herman and Mermelstein, filed the first civil action against Epstein on behalf of one of its seven clients who were molested by Epstein. The complaints that attorney Herma
EFTA00726015 51. three complaints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney= Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit "B"). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102
ury; commence outline mock jury thoughts and ideas; review all current e-mails, etc. 1.80 hr $900.00 03/17/2009 BM Conference with RDC: call to Mermelstein's office; pull Doe #3 and 4 Answers to 3.10 hr $387.50 Interrogatories to obtain addresses; search Internet for additional addresses; print resul
ephone call from Jack re: A.0 and notes 0.20 hr $100.00 03/30/2009 RDC Motion to Quash in BB 0.60 hr $300.00 03/30/2009 RDC Conference with Josephsberg 0.70 hr $350.00 03/30/2009 RDC Receipt and review 3 letters from Jack Hill re: A.C. 0.30 hr 5150.00 03/31/2009 RDC Prepare for hearing; rea
9 EFTA00602853 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Mermelstein 01319 08/11/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein Depo Joint-privilege 01316 08/27/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Depo
tos & Lehrman BATES DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 04202.04206 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards William Berger Epstein's attorneys & Bob Josephsberg have filed several motions on limits of the no contact order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to
9 EFTA00310066 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Mermelstein 01319 08/11/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein Depo Joint-privilege 01316 08/27/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Depo
tos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION DBJECTION 04202.04206 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards William Berger Epstein's attorneys & Bob Josephsberg have filed several motions on limits of the no contact order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to
Entities connected to both Mermelstein and Josephsberg

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Podhurst
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON