Epstein Secrets

o believe that, around this same time, Mr. Sloman’s former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.> At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named pa

in the former firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled “Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein,” despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

eason to believe that, around this same time, Mr. former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner

er in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

ow Cab -BB 04/09/2009 RDC Read Gustaferro's e-mail 04109/2009 RDC Conference with JE 04/09/2009 RDC Conference with Jack Hill re: resolution Saige 04/09/2009 RDC Letter/memo to Marty re: Saige release 04/09/2009 RDC Receipt and review Order Specially Setting earing on June 26 - BB 3.00hr

; Doe II - Clerk's Notice of Reassignment 04/13/2009 RDC Receipt and review Doe ll's offer of settlement 04/13/2009 MJP Review and analysis of Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion to Slay 04/14/2009 RDC E-mails; review motions/responses re: Pacer on #2-7; Response to Stay 04/14/2009 RDC Co

tatutes, conference with Rita 1.80 hr $900.00 Budnyk and Robert Critton regarding Motion to Dismiss CMA Amended Complaint 03/10/2009 RDC Revise Saige closing documents; letter to Spencer; telephone conference with 0.60 hr $300.00 Robson's attorney: e-mall 03/10/2009 RDC Receipt and review AC

ncorporate specific factual allegations from 2nd Amended Complaint 1.20 hr $360.00 03/25/2009 RHB Conference with paralegal regarding filing of Jane Doe's 2-5 Responses to 0.10 hr $30.00 Motions to Compel 03/25/2009 RHB Review Jane Doe's 2-7 2nd Amended Complaints for viable c/a, Count III 0.75 hr

Heidi Fleiss type character who took advan of Epstein's appetite. (I know that's a ridiculous thought . . .) I think you are correct about taking Saige out. That seems like the best option. C. (USAFLS) (rialto it 25, 2008 4:38 PM name on the Internet From: Sent: Fr y To: Subject: RE: Iii T

State Attorney's Office to charge her. I think that I am gilt take Saige out of the substantive counts of the indictment. I will leave her in as a Jane Doe on items that can testify about. so we don't have to call Saige as a witness. What do you think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Su

e, one of the school principals intervened. The principal searched M.'s purse and found $300 cash. The principal asked . where the money came from. Saige initially claimed that she earned the money working at "Chik-Fil-A," which no one believed. Saige then claimed that she made the money selling drugs

n violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). Jane Does #1 through #19 were all minors at the time EFTA00229756 of their involvement with defendant Epstein. Jane Doe #11 was a resident of New York; the remaining Jane Does were all residents of Palm Beach County, Florida, at the time of their involvement with defe

r object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." Fl. Stat. § 800.04(1)(a). The only girl under 16, Saige, was digitally penetrated, which satisfies this definition. "The Florida Legislature currently is amending § 800.04(7) making it a second-degree fe

the overt acts and substantive allegations related to each Jane Doe because the indictment has been revised to group the overt acts related to each Jane Doe. 'Each of the airplanes is held in a separate "shell corporation," JEGE, Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. Epstein is the sole shareholder in both of th

like she was being ripped off. Q Okay. What about Gonzales, did she tell you about what happened? A Yes. Q What did she explain to you? A Saige, on the way home, had told me she got paid $300, and basically let him insert lingers in her and use the massager on her. Q Okay. And she told y

locate and interview 11 more girls? 12 A Yes. 13 Q Let's turn to the specific evidence reporting 14 the overt acts and offenses relating to Jane Doe's 1 15 through 5. I know that every member of the grand jury has 16 a copy of the draft indictment before them, and also a 17 chart. 18 Do you

ug dealer at 5:45 a.m., only two days after returning to West Palm Beach, and being described by the officer as clearly on drugs; and (iii) both of Saige's parents' criminal history of fraud. In stark contrast to this is the fact that, as we indicated at the meeting, the client has passed both a rigo

e and told het to sit on top of him Out of tear and trepidation she complied. As lane Doe tubbed Epatettia chess Epstein began to use a vibrator on Jane Doe's xagina. Thereafter Epstein began to digu ally stimulate and attempt to penetrate fank,Prse:s. vagina. Al this same time, Epstein was mastoids-Xing U