Epstein Secrets

eason to believe that, around this same time, Mr. former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner

eral charges that limited Epstein's sentencing exposure . . . " See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. . In fact, by a email dated August 3, 2007, Criminal Division Chief Matthew Menchel advised the defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3,

r object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." Fl. Stat. § 800.04(1)(a). The only girl under 16, Saige, was digitally penetrated, which satisfies this definition. "The Florida Legislature currently is amending § 800.04(7) making it a second-degree fe

07 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment char in Jeffrey Epste

e calls and the evidence retrieved via a "trash pull" from Epstein's house. One of the recovered items was a written message that Haley would bring Saige on the upcoming Saturday, which matched the evidence from the controlled calls. Robson and Miller's telephone records have been subpoenaed and anal

randum SubjectDate Prosecution MemorandumMarch 10, 2007 In re Operation Leap Year ToFrom R. Alexander Acosta U.S. Attorney Jeff Sloman Chief, Criminal Division Andrew Lourie, MAUSA Northern Division Karen Atkinson, Chief Northern Division A. Marie Villafalia Assistant U.S. Attorney I. INTRODUCTION T

o believe that, around this same time, Mr. Sloman’s former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.> At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named pa

our review of this case is limited both factually and legally. We have not looked at the entire universe of facts in this case. It is not the role of the Criminal Division to conduct a complete factual inquiry from scratch.” (CEOS letter at p. 1). Indeed, entire subject areas relevant to the inquiry were not considered

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the ' request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded

e negotiations of a deferred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwise, that meets the requi