Epstein Secrets

that persons close to her would personally profit. Ms. inappropriutely attempted toterinate Bert ()cariz for attorney re despite thi fact that Mr. Ocariz • turns out to be I very good personal friend or Ms. boyfriend. linen she assiduously kept hidden from counsel. We requested alternate c owes im

by I third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested' meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as

5 9/27/07 10:52 am Lefk E-mail forwarding questions from Ocariz 6 9/27/07 3:06 pm Lefk E-mail to Lefkowitz responding to his concerns about Ocariz's questions EFTA00190106 7 10/3/07 Lefk E-mail to schedule conference call with 3:15 pm memo regarding attorney representative selection pro

nt in his letter that he needs to conduct "due diligence" on selection of Podhurst firm 31 11/28/07 Starr Fisher Letter requesting meeting with Fisher 32 11/28/07 4:35 pm E-mail asking to send proposed victim notification letter to Lefkowitz in response to Lefkowitz's complaints about notifyi

om an unlimited number of highly skilled and well paid attorneys. was that person. One of your letters suggests a business relationship between Mr. Ocariz and my boyfriend. This is patently untrue and neither my boyfriend nor I would have received any financial benefit from Mr. Ocariz's appointment. F

by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as

se is that I "assiduously" hid from you the fact that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. US_Atty_Cor_00267 EFTA00235593 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13,2007 PAGE 2 OF 5 I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a

that defense counsel may wish to seek review of our determinations in Washington D.C., I spoke this past Monday with the Assistant Attorney General Fisher, to Inform her of a possible appeal, to ask her to grant the potential request for review, and to In fret review this case In an copedited manner to

close to her would personally profit. Ms. inappropriately attempted to nominate Bert Oeariz liar attorney representative. despite t e act that Mr. Ocariz turns out to be a very good personal friend or ms. vmatcanis boyfriend, a fact she assiduously kept hidden from counsel. We requested alternate cho

by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Stan has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as

represented parties who must be contacted only through their counsel. Your concerns regarding the § 2255 litigation are unfounded. As you know, Mr. Ocariz had been told that he would be the attorney representative for the victims. As a matter of professional courtesy, he was informed that the Office d

eview it. We strongly urge that you withhold the notification letter until after we are able to discuss this matter with Assistant Attorney General Fisher. Yours S Ciely, Kenneth W. Starr Jg witz ic cc: Honorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. At