Epstein Secrets

letter now accuses me of "manufacturing" charges of obstruction of justice, making obscene phone calls, and violating child privacy laws. When Mr. Lourie told you that those charges would "embarrass the Office," he meant that the Office was unwilling to bend the facts to satisfy Mr. Epstein's desired

s heing prosecuted by ('EOS. With that in mind, we welcome the upponanity to review 11w extensive research that CLOS bas done, as indicated by your Orrice. RFP MIA 000460 EFTA00208941 12/11/2007 11:48 FAX e021/099 • KiRKLAND & ELLIS LLP It. Alexander Acosta December I I, 2007 Page 18 the alle

r letter now accuses me of "manufacturing" charges of obstruction ofjustice, making obscene phone calls, and violating child privacy laws. When Mr. Lourie told you that those charges would "embarrass the Office," he meant that the Office was unwilling to bend the facts to satisfy Mr. Epstein's desired

counsel. We also learned from Ms. that she shared with the summary of charges the government was considering against Mr. Epstein. Even after your Orrice conceded that it was inappmpriatc tor is attorneys to select the attorney representative. Ms. Villafana co • ued to lobby for Mr. appointment. On

letter now accuses me of "manufacturing" charges of obstruction of justice, making obscene phone calls, and violating child privacy laws. When Mr. Lourie told you that those charges would "embarrass the Office," he meant that the Office was unwilling to bend the facts to satisfy Mr. Epstein's desired

tter.' `Dave conferred with the AUSA rite nugotiated this language, and have been informed that parties intended this to address gas of venue. This Orrice wal not interpret this paragraph as my waiver of Subject matter jariselictiOn. Please Inform weir deflates counsel dila/fees oos EFTA00289816 12