Epstein Secrets

titled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to Andrew Lourie with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman, Matt Menchal, Andrew Lourie, and Marie Villaftuia with handwritten attorne

llafafia regarding letter received from Lilly Ann Sanchez Work Product Deliberative Process 49 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NP

so the plea agreement would have had to be a binding plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), which is what I drafted. I was informed by Mr. Lourie that USA Acosta did not want to do a (c)(1)(C) plea, so I had to find charges that would result in a two-year statutory maximum. This resulted in m

line to enter his guilty plea would be extended again, and we continued preparing for indictment (Exhibits B-34 through B-37). So, on May 27, 2008, Bob Senior, who took Matt Menchel's place as Criminal Chief, Jeff Sloman, who had taken over for USA Acosta due to his recusal from the Epstein matter, Karen

k Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014026 thru P-014027 7/16/2007 email from Marie Villafafia to Matt Menchel and Andrew Lourie regarding correspondence from Roy Black and Motion to Quash 6(e) Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014028 thru P-014

estions Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-014781 thru P-014800 3/19/2008-3/27/2008 emails between Jeff Sloman, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, Rolando Garcia, Nesbitt Kurykendall, and Jason Richards regarding waiting for DC's decision regarding Epstein's challenges to NPA