Epstein Secrets

kendall 2/12/2007 A. Marie Villafafia Lilly Ann Sanchez Emails between Villafatia and Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding employee representation with Lourie and Villafatia handwritten notes 2/14/2007 Subpoena to Colonial Bank (return date 3/6/07) 2/14/2007 Subpoena to Palm Beach National Bank (return

Child Exploration Statutes in Tide 18 10/19/2006 Subpoena to Individual #28 (return date 10/27/06) 10/24/2006 Email chain between Villafafia and Jim Eisenberg discussing Individual #28 1) 10/30/2006 Villafatia Guy Lewis Email re representation of Jeffrey Epstein I 10/31/2006 Villafaria Guy Lewis Em

titled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to Andrew Lourie with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman, Matt Menchal, Andrew Lourie, and Marie Villafafla with handwritten attorne

you want to push the issue you will have to get formal immati. I will accept service now and In the future for you so you don't have to chase down. Jim Eisenberg 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013875 EFTA00191388 Memorandum Subject Re: Jeffrey Epstein Investigation Date July 26, 2011 To From Benjamin Greenber

ffrey Sloman and Andrei Londe arguing against federal prosecution. 34 7/13/2007 Letter from Roy Black to Marie Villa' la with handwritten attorney Lourie notes 35 7/25/2007 latter from Gerald l.efrourt and Alan Dershowia to Matthew Menchel arguing that no charge can or should be made under 18 U.S.C

ctims with notice of state change of plea hearing. 13-20 19/11/2007 Email from Marie Villafana toJeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with Jim Eisenberg 13.21 12/21/2007 Letter from Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta re wanting to sec victim list B.22 12/26/2007 Letter from Jay Lelkowitz. to Alex Acost

so the plea agreement would have had to be a binding plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), which is what I drafted. I was informed by Mr. Lourie that USA Acosta did not want to do a (c)(1)(C) plea, so I had to find charges that would result in a two-year statutory maximum. This resulted in m

send. (Exhibit B-14). At 5:08 pm, I received an email from Jeff Sloman that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10 007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for