Epstein Secrets

ection 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments raised at the September 7th meeting, and after conferring with the FBI and with Chief Oosterbaan, our Office decided to proceed with the indictment. At that time, I reminded Mr. Lefkowitz that he had previously indicated his desire to appeal suc

erstood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns regarding our prosecution. To ensure a full consideration of your arguments, I invited Drew Oosterbaan, Chief of the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, to travel from Washington to attend our meeting. During the September 7t

position, immaterial to the present litigation, on whether Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") committed crimes (other than those to which he pled guilty in Palm Beach County Circuit Court). 'For example, Petitioners were repeatedly advised the Epstein lived in Palm Beach, not West Palm Beach. Even this simple correction was ignored.

ry led me to conclude that the inclusion of a provision under § 2255 would be the best way to protect the victims' right to restitution. CEOS Chief Oosterbaan described the agreement as "a very significant result that will serve the victims well" (Exhibit 71). I should note that a plea to one of the feder

hel had engaged in plea discussions with Lilly Ann Sanchez. (Exhibit 3.) The second was in early September 2007 after my discussion with CEOS Chief Drew Oosterbaan regarding this subject. (Exhibit 44.) Later, I believe after the NPA was already signed, Jeff Sloman told me that the Office had taken the position

ed a letter from attorney Richard Willits, advising me that he represented Individual #3 and that he had filed suit on her behalf against Epstein in Palm Beach County Circuit Court (Exhibit B-41). I responded, acknowledging his representation (Exhibit B-42). On June 18, 2008, I liv received a call from attorney Brad ards, who

o conduct "due diligence" on selection of Podhurst firm 11/27/2007 Plea Notification Letter at 7:11 pm B 3 11/28/2007 A. Marie Villafaiia, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia A. Laurie Email re non-prosecution agreement with attached correpondence 11/28/2007 Alice S. Fisher, Assistant Attorney General S

etter - 5 pages (CEOS) B-28 3/28/2008 Villafana Danchuk Letter advising of representation of Individual #3 and that a lawsuit has been filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court B-41 4/1/2008 Jay Lefkowitz Jeffrey Sloman Draft letter regarding termination of agreement Privileged Confidential Page 32 of 51 Contains 6(e)

To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: confidential communication Dear Alex: I am writing to you because I have just received the attached letter from Drew Oosterbaan. In light of that letter, and given the critical new evidence discussed below, I would like to request a meeting with you, mindful of our July 8 de

numerated offenses set forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255. Specifically, the Agreement mandates, inter cilia, (1) a guilty plea in Palm Beach County Circuit Court to solicitation of prostitution (Fl. Stat. Section 796.07) and procurement of minors to engage in prostitution (Fl. Stat. Section 796.03) (an offens

conduct "due dilligence" on selection of Podhurst firm 11/27/2007 Plea Notification Letter at 7:11 pm )3-3 11/28/2007 A. Marie Villafaiia, A. Oosterbaan, R. Garcia A. Lourie Email re non-prosecution agreement with attached correpondence 11/28/2007 Alice S. Fisher, Assistant Attorney General S

tter - 5 pages (CEOS) B-28 3/28/2008 Villafalia Danchuk Letter advising of representation of Individual #3 and that a lawsuit has been filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court B-41 4/1/2008 Jay Lefkowitz Jeffrey Sloman Draft letter regarding termination of agreement Privileged Confidential Page 32 of 51 Contains 6(c)